Even the most determined optimist would have been forgiven for thinking this day would never come. It’s been 738 days of captivity for the last surviving Israeli hostages. 738 days since one of history’s most pervasive wounds was ripped open. A wound that oozed pain from Southern Israel to Tel Aviv to Gaza, that violently spread across the region from Tehran, to Beirut, to Yemen, that divided communities, campuses, congregations, and even at times caused fissures within our own personal psyches. Over the weekend, someone asked me what I was going to write about the impending hostage release. After 738 days, I answered, “I’ll believe it when I see it.” Now that I’m seeing it, I can only think of one word to say: Shalom. What are we saying goodbyeto? If I answered, half of readers would be furious I went too far and half would be furious I didn’t go far enough. That turmoil might be replayed in my own mind. Today we can’t agree on the most basic issues. We’re not going to agree about the most complex one. What are we saying hello to? Beyond the homecoming hostages and what one hopes will be more than a temporary ceasefire, I’m not sure. Let’s give it a few days before we assess how the last 738 days will reshape the region and the world. Given that we’re talking about the Middle East, it may take a few thousand days—or even a few thousand years—for a full assessment. We can’t agree on much, but we should at least be able to agree on this: Today is a good day. Because it’s not day 739. Reuniting families are saying Shalom to one another. Shalom has settled, at least for a moment, on the region. And the wound that has spread so far and poisoned so much, at long last has a glimmer of hope in its prognosis, as the world stopped rubbing salt and started spreading salve. To the hostages and the very notion of healing: Welcome home. And Shalom. 2A New Don in the Middle East?“What made Mr. Netanyahu make a decision against his natural inclination to kick the can down the road, as well as agree to pretty much everything he said he opposed? Simply, Mr. Trump. Israel’s botched attempt to assassinate members of the Hamas leadership in Doha, Qatar, began a cascade of events that led the president and his Qatari, Egyptian and Turkish counterparts to pressure Israel on one side, and Hamas on the other, into signing onto a framework agreement and apparently negotiating the details later. Saying ‘No,’ or ‘Yes, but,’ and playing for time was not an option.” NYT (Gift Article): The Uncomfortable Truth About Netanyahu’s ‘Victory.’ (The main victory Bibi wants is at the ballot box.) 3Circle Perk“Never before has so much money been spent so rapidly on a technology that, for all its potential, remains largely unproven as an avenue for profit-making. And often, these investments can be traced back to two leading firms: Nvidia and OpenAI. The recent wave of deals and partnerships involving the two are escalating concerns that an increasingly complex and interconnected web of business transactions is artificially propping up the trillion-dollar AI boom. At stake is virtually every corner of the economy, with the hype and buildout of AI infrastructure rippling across markets, from debt and equity to real estate and energy.” Bloomberg (Gift Article): OpenAI, Nvidia Fuel $1 Trillion AI Market With Web of Circular Deals. If the bubble bursts, these circular demand-driving deals could turn into a circular firing squad. 4Let Them Eat Cake (In Moderation)“On the internet, crunchy moms of seemingly all political stripes post recipes for homemade goldfish crackers, for example, or hand-sculpted chicken nuggets. TikTok influencers show off the unprocessed steamed cauliflower and carrot salad that they’ve prepared for their toddlers. (Suspiciously missing are images of the toddlers actually eating this food.)” Olga Khazan in The Atlantic (Gift Article): Avoiding Ultra-Processed Foods Is Completely Unrealistic. 5Extra, ExtraWeaponized Justice: “The question raised by the prosecution of James is: would any other federal prosecutor have brought this case against any other defendant? The answer seems to be no.” The New Yorker: The Indictment of Letitia James and the Collapse of Impartial Justice. |