Points of Return
To get John Authers’ newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here. Gold just suffered its worst day since 2013. It’s still beat
View in browser
Bloomberg

To get John Authers’ newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here.

Today’s Points:

Gold Gets Heavy

Gold is a heavy metal and it must be handled carefully. Visitors to the New York Fed’s vaults who want to hold a gold bar must wear specially reinforced shoes. Otherwise, if they drop the bar, they might no longer have a foot.

A Bad Day in a Great Year 
This is relevant as the gold price has just dropped more than 5% in a day for the first time in 12 years. In dollar terms, the fall of $230 is the greatest ever. The chances are that somebody out there has just crushed their foot.

Any move this sudden and drastic must be taken seriously. But it also needs context. This is how gold and its cousin silver — prone to even more violent speculative swings — have fared so far this month:

This is not (yet) a crash, or even a correction. Precious metals’ phenomenal year continues. Even after this selloff, and taking dividends into account, gold has easily beaten the S&P 500 and even Bitcoin:

Debasement

So, what has driven gold this year? In one word, it would appear to be “debasement.” The fear that inflation and lax money will lead to the intrinsic devaluation of the dollar and other fiat currencies has been turned of late into a “debasement trade.” It’s often said that narratives lead markets, and the dwindling dollar has become a powerful narrative. This is Bloomberg News Trends’ count of all the stories from all sources appearing on the terminal that include the word:

Google Trends, counting similar searches in the US, is also dramatic. Interest shot up this month:

The strength of the narrative, then, is unquestionable. “The Debasement Trade” could be a great thriller, with a trailer voiced by Don LaFontaine. But why now? It’s been reasonable to worry about the dollar’s debasement, and to hedge against it with gold, since at least the moment in 1971 when President Richard Nixon ended the formal convertibility of the dollar into gold at a fixed price. Since the Global Financial Crisis, which the US survived without a full-blown Great Depression by printing lots of money, the risk of debasement has been blatantly obvious for all to see. Since the weekend in September 2008 when Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy, the dollar has gained 25% against other fiat currencies, represented in the DXY dollar index, but lost about 80% in gold terms. So why the sudden fascination?

A further point concerns fiscal policy. When governments spend beyond their means, inflation and debasement are obvious risks. The US, with its One Big Beautiful Bill, seems happy to steer that course. If there are such worries, they should show up in higher yields on longer-dated government bonds to compensate investors for the risk of debasement. 

And indeed, yields have edged up across the developed world this year, despite the perception that governments now have inflation under control and can afford to borrow more. But there is a big exception: America. The 10-year Treasury yield, arguably an even more important metric for global finance than the gold price, is down more than 50 basis points for 2025. It’s below 4%, at its lowest in more than a year. This as US inflation is rising again, in an epic debasement scare:

The underlying narrative makes sense to some extent. All of us should be concerned about the risk of debasement. Sudden overweaning terror at this juncture, however, seems misplaced.

Past Bulls

It’s useful to compare with the last two great bull markets, which peaked in January 1980 at the depths of fears over eternal stagflation, and in September 2011 after Standard & Poor’s had downgraded US Treasuries’ credit rating. This bull market looks very much like 2011 and nothing like 1980:

In January 1980, the Soviet Union had just invaded Afghanistan, there were US hostages in Tehran, the Federal Reserve was hiking rates, US stocks were deep in a bear market, and all hope had been lost. This gold rally has coincided with what many describe as a stock market bubble. 

Looking more closely at 2011, and at the very different behavior of stocks, reveals more differences. Back then, S&P triggered an extreme “debasement trade.” Within weeks, the world was still turning, it was apparent that the QE bond purchases of the era hadn’t sparked inflation, and a fresh equity bull market was underway.

This time, gold has outperformed a booming stock market, and there was no clear triggering event like the downgrade to get people talking about debasement:

One other point from past bull markets: They grow more erratic in their final extreme phrase. The Nasdaq in 1999-2000 and the Shanghai stock exchange in 2007 both saw numerous sharp corrections as they went parabolic. As this unscientific comparison suggests, Tuesday’s selloff looks more like the start of a final phase than the top:

So Who’s Been Buying?

So why has the narrative taken hold now? Probably because the professionals can see that there are big new purchases of gold, and debasement has been retro-fitted as a narrative to explain it. Writing last week, Deutsche Bank’s Steven Zeng warned that custody holdings of US Treasuries for foreign central banks had declined in 11 of the past 14 weeks, and hit their lowest level in more than 13 years.

The outflows started in April and accelerated in August after Powell’s dovish pivot at Jackson Hole. Importantly, the latest shift comes amid the gold surge, suggesting a possible connection such as one or more foreign central banks reallocating out of Treasuries and into gold.

This plausibly explains why the narrative took hold right at this point. The Tuesday snapback isn’t because of any reversal of this trend; there’s no evidence that foreign banks have started selling gold again. Rather this looks like an overreaction to genuine news (not unlike gold’s response to the Standard & Poor’s downgrade in 2011):

Another empirical reason to bet on debasement now comes from evidence that Chinese investors are buying. Jim Bianco of Bianco Research points to the data on Chinese gold warrants — certificates that indicate the holder has physical gold in a warehouse recognized by the Shanghai Futures Exchange:

Bianco comments: “If anyone asks the question, ‘Who is buying gold?,’ show them the updated chart and say, ‘China.’” It’s this extra buying that got the gold price moving, and prompted new interest in the decades-long phenomenon of debasement. The latest selloff might be the top of the biggest gold bull market since 2011 — but for now it’s best viewed as a violent correction to over-excitement in a plausible narrative. 

Two Havens, One Loser

These days, gold isn’t the only way to trade debasement. Bitcoin was founded to counter fiat currencies, and its investors are used to price swings. But its relationship to political instability, particularly concerning China, a supplier of the raw materials for the crypto ecosystem, is almost the polar opposite of gold.

Bitcoin’s selloff this month, triggered by US-China trade tensions, was brutal. In just over a week, it tumbled nearly 15% after surging past $125,000 earlier in the month, wiping more than $600 billion off the total value of the crypto market at one point.

Retail investors lost an estimated $17 billion on Bitcoin exposure through digital asset treasury firms such as Metaplanet and Michael Saylor’s Strategy, Bloomberg News reported. The losses came from an overpricing of share premiums that allowed these companies to sell stock for far above the value of their actual crypto holdings. 

The wipeout coincided with the gold rally, and Bitcoin’s reprieve came after Trump dialed back his aggressive tone on China. That sparked a rebound of about 6% since Friday. Such whiplash doesn’t bolster the case for crypto as a safe-haven asset. This is Bitcoin’s performance relative to gold since the start of the year:

Bitcoin does have some haven-like qualities. But gold’s universal appeal and liquidity are far more attractive during bouts of political uncertainty. This chart from ByteTree Group details a growing inverse relationship between flows into the two asset classes:

Crypto’s dreadful week was fueled by stress in regional banks, which appears to have cooled. Still, the selloff raises the question of how vulnerable Bitcoin remains to sudden shocks, especially with US-China trade relations still frosty? Could a renewed flare-up trigger another wipeout of similar magnitude?

Charlie Morris of ByteTree argues that the scale of the decline reflected excessive leverage across the system, with Trump’s response to Beijing’s rare-earth export curbs serving as the spark:

Bitcoin is used to this. Bitcoin doesn’t have legacy problems, like there’s no big private credit buildup or something like that. It’s just everyone’s been flushed out in a short period of time. And so all the leverage money has been taken out of the system very quickly. And so Bitcoin is less risky now than it was two weeks ago.

Jeff Dorman of Arca Investments adds that what followed the deleveraging wasn’t merely despair but a market reset: “While the road ahead remains rocky, the cracks in the infrastructure and sentiment are starting to heal.” More than 150 crypto-related ETFs are filed and working their way toward clearance from the Securities and Exchange Commission. Bloomberg Intelligence’s James Seyffart says nine should be approved by year-end under the agency’s new generic listing standards:

The nine assets that we believe have a 99% chance of SEC approval before the end of December meet the requirement of having regulated futures contracts for at least six months.  

Meanwhile, a regulatory change this summer allows large investors to hand their Bitcoin to an ETF in exchange for shares. Such in-kind transactions, approved in July, are generally tax-neutral, with no cash changing hands and no sale recorded. That turns a volatile digital asset into a line item on a brokerage statement, easier to borrow against, pledge as collateral, or pass onto heirs. Crypto can still find plenty more buyers.

— Richard Abbey

Survival Tips

Shirley Eaton’s memorable end in ‘Goldfinger.’ Photographer: Screen Archives/Getty

We’ve done this before in this space, but there’s always time for a few gold songs. If you’re still interested in the shiny metal, try Golden Years by David Bowie, Gold by Spandau Ballet, Heart of Gold by Neil Young, Gold Mother by James, New Gold Dream by Simple Minds, Golden Slumbers by the Beatles, Silver and Gold by U2, Gold Digger by Kanye West, Gold Dust Woman by Fleetwood Mac, Golden by Harry Styles, Golden Brown by the Stranglers, Goldfinger by Shirley Bassey, or Gold Guns Girls by Metric. Or you could debase still further and try Hi-Ho Silver Lining by Jeff Beck (with an extraordinary lineup of backing singers including Chrissie Hynde, Tom Jones and Robert Plant). Any more? 

More From Bloomberg Opinion

  • Juan Pablo Spinetto: The Optimist’s Case for Mexico
  • Gearoid Reidy: Japan’s New Iron Lady Can Play Heavy-Metal Politics
  • Marc Champion: Trump’s Peacemaking Is as Lethal for Ukraine as Ever

Want more Bloomberg Opinion? OPIN. Or you can subscribe to our daily newsletter.

Like Bloomberg's Points of Return? Subscribe for unlimited access to trusted, data-based journalism in 120 countries around the world and gain expert analysis from exclusive daily newsletters like Markets Daily or Odd Lots.

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.

Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Points of Return newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent