job boards
Looking to run an NIH institute? You’ve got two weeks to apply
If you’ve ever wanted to run an institute at the nation’s top funder of biomedical research, I have good news: There are six director openings across the National Institutes of Health’s 27 centers and institutes. I also have bad news: You have two weeks — or less — to apply.
The National Library of Medicine, National Human Genome Research Institute, and institutes dedicated to general medical sciences, child health and human development, and dental and craniofacial research are among those looking for new directors. Many of these openings were announced on Nov. 7 and are set to close on Nov. 21. The leadership vacancies are yet another sign of intense turmoil within the agency during the first year of Trump’s return to the White House, as several institute heads were ousted earlier this year.
autism
If you’re pregnant and in pain, it’s OK to take Tylenol
Despite President Trump’s claims, scientists don’t have enough evidence to say acetaminophen use during pregnancy is linked to autism, according to a new review of the literature published Sunday in The BMJ.
After looking at nine systematic reviews investigating a potential link between childhood autism and ADHD and paracetamol use during pregnancy (it’s still acetaminophen, just British), the authors found very weak associations, tons of confounding factors, and no legitimate biological mechanism. The authors recommended that pregnant people continue to take the medicine to treat pain.
The findings rebuke claims by President Trump and top federal health officials that acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, should only be used as a last resort during pregnancy. They said the changes, which would constitute a major shift in how doctors treat pain, were necessary to combat the rising rates of autism prevalence in the United States. But as STAT’s Matt Herper wrote at the time, the science didn’t match the hype.
Are you pregnant, a doctor, or an FDA employee whose life or work changed because of Trump’s September presser? Reach out here. — O. Rose Broderick
first opinion
It’s time to reward care rather than cure services
Dominick Reuter/AFP via Getty Images
Despite our aging population, there are relatively few geriatric-trained physicians, as young doctors saddled with debt tend to pick more lucrative fields. But writing in a STAT First Opinion, Daniel Plotkin has an idea for how to change that: require Medicare to pay doctors and other health care professionals more for spending time and fostering relationships with patients.
Plotkin, a geriatric psychiatrist, acknowledges that the proposed change would require recruiting, training, and compensating more primary care physicians. He also adds that the scheme would require an attitude change. “It’s easy to understand why the soft care model of caring for old people goes against our grain,” Plotkins writes. “Indeed, our love for technical procedures and the revenue generated by doing a lot of them wins out, so we spend most of our health care dollars on expensive, low-yield procedures toward the end of life.”