|
 |
Messages from recent Ink subscribers: “Because we need to be reminded of what compassion and caring can do” (Steve)… “Thoughtful perspectives and discussion, wonderful guests, depth, useful suggestions to cope and resist. Snark and humor for these challenging times” (Marilen)… “I find your style and delivery calm and assured. Never hysterical, though that word describes how I feel most days. Thank you and your fellow journalists for dedicating your lives to telling the truth” (RL)… “I have seen you both question yourself and think strategically without demonizing those who hold differing opinions and watched you grow in your own perspective and encourage others to do the same” (Barbara)… “Anand gets to the why of things (Michele).” Join Steve, Marilen, RL, Barbara, and Michele, and support independent media by becoming a paid subscriber for the price of a coffee a month.
 |
Happy Saturday, Ink readers!
If you’re in the Northern Hemisphere, this weekend brings with it the winter solstice, the beginning of winter, the shortest and darkest day of the year, and an opportunity to consider that we are headed for brighter days, no matter how gloomy it may seem right now. And with that in mind, we invite you, our supporting subscribers, to spend some time reading along with us, so — as we do each weekend — we’ve collected some of the most interesting writing and thinking we’ve come across during the week.
Welcome to today’s edition of Weekend Reads.
You won’t want to miss any of it. Thank you so much to our supporting subscribers for making this newsletter possible. If you haven’t yet joined our community, why not become part of this and help us build the future of independent media today?
Look upon my works
For those who understand architecture as a symbolic project, a practice that aims to express and concretize an ideological vision—especially of the future—Trump’s Winter Palace tack-on is more interesting and begins to make more sense. Unlike the left and especially unlike liberals, the right has assembled for itself an aesthetic program, an answer to what the future should look like, slopified as it may be. Indeed, like all fascists, its broader program is to aestheticize politics itself. (One must here remember the difference, articulated best by Godard, between the liberal idea of making political art and the socialist idea of making art politically so as to not fall into the same trap.) In short, conservatives understand that the project of politics is nothing short of remaking (or unmaking) the world itself. [The New York Review of Architecture]...
