The politics stories editors and readers want you to see ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
The Conversation

At breakfast the other morning, I told my husband – also a journalist – that I had to write a newsletter introduction based on my favorite stories of 2025, and that I was going to get PTSD if I had to look over the past year’s stories to find them. His response: “There’s your lede.”

It was a rough year in America. Regardless of your political perspective, it was a year of immense and often unprecedented change in the roles, structures and institutions of government. That change extended to the very culture of government and how those in it behaved. Donald Trump aimed a metaphorical wrecking ball at Congress and its powers, at the independence of the U.S. Department of Justice, and at the very idea of free speech and dissent. He aimed a literal wrecking ball at the East Wing of the White House.

Throughout all this change and upheaval, The Conversation U.S. politics desk has attempted to provide you, our readers, with the kind of sober analysis that will help you understand what has happened since Trump became president. We wanted to do other stories, too, stories that looked at something besides Donald Trump and his revolution. But there has barely been time. From the Supreme Court rulings to ICE prowling the streets of American cities and Trump’s massive expansion of the powers of the presidency, the news has broken at a relentless, unforgiving pace.

Our strategy to help you make sense of this moment is to produce stories about the institutions and norms of government, to set a baseline for your understanding. As migrants – or people who may look like migrants – have been rounded up and deported on airplanes to faraway countries, we’ve given you stories describing due process and habeas corpus. When a patently unqualified person is elevated to a cabinet position, we’ve given you a story on what the person in that position does and is responsible for. When cabinet members appear at congressional oversight hearings and sneer at the lawmakers asking them hard questions, we gave you a story on the history of congressional oversight, and how it’s supposed to work.

We’re off for a break until 2026. I’m going to use those two weeks to cook, including my annual two-day process of making and freezing enough of Marcella Hazan’s Bolognese sauce to feed my family and friends over nine months. That’s about 60 servings, and boy does the house smell good when all that sauce is simmering on the stove. See you next year.

[ Understand what’s going on in Washington and around the world. Get our Politics Weekly newsletter. ]

Naomi Schalit

Senior Editor, Politics + Democracy

Editors' picks

In a series of cases over the past 15 years, the Supreme Court has moved in a pro-presidential direction. Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court is headed toward a radically new vision of unlimited presidential power

Graham G. Dodds, Concordia University

Recent rulings indicate that the high court is leaning toward expanding the type of presidential power that is more emblematic of dictatorship than democracy.

Erasing history is a deeply Orwellian thing to do. Elen11, iStock/Getty Images Plus

The Orwellian echoes in Trump’s push for ‘Americanism’ at the Smithsonian

Laura Beers, American University

Donald Trump aims to rewrite America’s official history, including at one of the nation’s key sites of public history-making: the Smithsonian. George Orwell would recognize Trump’s impulse.

A recruit participates in the Army’s future soldier prep course at Fort Jackson in Columbia, S.C., on Sept. 25, 2024. AP Photo/Chris Carlson

US Army’s image of power and flag-waving rings false to Gen Z weary of gun violence − and long-term recruitment numbers show it

Jacob Ware, Georgetown University

Generations already suffering a shattered sense of safety from US gun violence do not see the military as a viable option, a terrorism scholar argues.

The committee assigned to draft the Declaration of Independence, from left: Thomas Jefferson, Roger Sherman, Benjamin Franklin, Robert R. Livingston and John Adams. Currier & Ives image, photo by MPI/Getty Images

Along with the ideals it expresses, the Declaration of Independence mourns for something people lost in 1776 − and now, too

Maurizio Valsania, Università di Torino

For all the festivities around July 4, the nation’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence, actually depicts a wounded, fearful society, teetering on the brink of disaster. Sound familiar?

Readers' picks

A person walks past a homeless encampment in the Skid Row community in Los Angeles in June 2024. Mario Tama/Getty Images

San Francisco and other cities, following a Supreme Court ruling, are arresting more homeless people for living on the streets

Stephen Przybylinski, Michigan State University

More than one year after the Supreme Court’s Grants Pass v. Johnson ruling, a geographer who researches homelessness finds that the ruling is leading to more places criminalizing homelessness.

Donald Trump portrays himself as uniquely strong and powerful. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

How Trump could try to stay in power after his second term ends

Philip Klinkner, Hamilton College

Though the 22nd Amendment prohibits Trump from being elected president again, it does not prohibit him from serving as president beyond Jan. 20, 2029. A scholar of politics and history explains.

There are certain situations in which the military should not fall in line. Bo Zaunders/Corbis Documentary via Getty Images

Just follow orders or obey the law? What US troops told us about refusing illegal commands

Charli Carpenter, UMass Amherst; Geraldine Santoso, UMass Amherst

A majority of service members understand the distinction between legal and illegal orders.