Received this email from a friend? Sign up here.

Here's the latest on a setback for the BBC, a fiery exit from CBS, a shot at Apple from the FTC, and more. But first...

EXCLUSIVE

Twin meetings with Trump

Amid Paramount CEO David Ellison's ongoing hostile takeover bid for CNN and the rest of Warner Bros. Discovery, Ellison returned to the White House last week to meet privately with President Trump.

Ellison and Trump had two wide-ranging conversations, according to sources with knowledge of the meetings.

The timing of the meetings — early last week — is intriguing because Trump was asked by NBC's Tom Llamas on Wednesday about Paramount and Netflix's battle, and he said, "I haven't been involved." 

Trump seemed to marvel at the attention he's been getting from both Ellison and Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos, who has also met with Trump in recent months: "I must say, I guess I'm considered to be a very strong president," he told Llamas. "I've been called by both sides. It's the two sides, but I've decided I shouldn't be involved. The Justice Department will handle it."

That was a major shift for Trump, who had previously said he would be involved and signaled his preference for Paramount.

Paramount declines to comment

In the interview with NBC, Trump also alluded to the Paramount side's argument that Netflix's acquisition of Warner Bros. would be monopolistic: "There's a theory that one of the companies is too big and it shouldn't be allowed to do it, and the other company is saying something else. They’re beating the hell out of each other — and there'll be a winner."

Two days later, the WSJ reported that the DOJ is investigating whether Netflix "has engaged in anticompetitive tactics."

A Paramount spokesperson declined to comment on the White House meetings. The WH press office did not respond to a request for comment.

Ellison has been a repeated visitor to the White House during Trump 2.0, as has his father, Larry Ellison, a close Trump ally. 

Last December, the WSJ reported that David Ellison "offered assurances to Trump administration officials that if he bought Warner, he'd make sweeping changes to CNN." A few days after that story hit, Trump publicly said, "It's imperative that CNN be sold" and called the news organization's current leaders a "disgrace."

Of course, as you know, the pending Netflix-Warner deal is currently being reviewed by Trump administration regulators. The deal on the table does not involve any change of ownership at CNN.

CBS producer blasts 'new vision'

"CBS Evening News" producer Alicia Hastey left the network yesterday, but she didn't do so quietly, as the NYT's Ben Mullin reported on X.

In a farewell note, Hastey slammed the news division's new boss, Bari Weiss, though not by name. Hastey criticized the "sweeping new vision" and said stories may be evaluated "not just on their journalistic merit but on whether they conform to a shifting set of ideological expectations — a dynamic that pressures producers and reporters to self-censor or avoid challenging narratives that might trigger backlash or unfavorable headlines."

 >> Alexandra Steigrad reports that roughly 1/4th of eligible "Evening News" staffers, or 11 employees, have accepted buyout offers.

Conservatives get FTC to target Apple News

Conservative activists have been claiming for months that Apple News doesn't link to right-wing media outlets. This week, the complaints reached Trump and prompted a swift response from FTC chair Andrew Ferguson — opening yet another front in the Trump administration's attacks on the media.

In a letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook yesterday, Ferguson suggested Apple might be violating consumer protection laws and urged him to "review" the matter.

Key quote: "The First Amendment protects the speech of Big Tech firms. But the First Amendment has never extended its protection to material misrepresentations made to consumers, nor does it immunize speakers from conduct that Congress has deemed unfair under the FTC Act, even if that conduct involves speech." 

Is this just another instance of the government jawboning a media company? Probably. But it's one to monitor. 

Full disclosure: I'm a producer on Apple TV's "The Morning Show," and I guest-hosted a handful of Apple News podcast episodes back in 2024.

Here's the backstory...

It's worth taking a closer look at how this claim bubbled up, because it shows who and what gets the government's attention right now. MRC Free Speech America, an arm of the Media Research Center, says it has been tracking the sources that are promoted by the app. Here's an example from last November: "Apple News Censors Right-Leaning Media for Entire Week."

In December, Fox News amplified the conservative org's concerns. In January, the group got even louder. "Apple, you need to stop hating half of America," MRC VP Dan Schneider wrote on X, in one of dozens of tweets about this topic.

On Tuesday, the New York Post published a story about conservative outlets being "shut out," citing MRC's "study," and quoting Schneider saying, "it could be illegal." Trump shared a link to the Post on Truth Social at 1:23 a.m. Wednesday, and Ferguson weighed in that afternoon.

Apple has not commented on Ferguson's letter, but the company previously said that the news app includes a vast array of sources, "including the Wall Street Journal, Fox News, Bloomberg, USA Today, Washington Examiner, New York Post, CBS News, local outlets, and more." And others have pointed out glaring weaknesses in the "study."

 >> The awkward part: MRC wants more links to "right-leaning publications," but the reality is that those publications rarely break big stories. Right-wing media is mostly reactive, meaning regurgitating and opining on news reported from elsewhere.

THIS JUST IN...

Judge lets Trump's BBC suit go to trial

A favorable ruling for Trump in Florida: US district judge Roy Altman has "rejected the BBC's application to delay the process of discovery" in Trump's lawsuit against the network. The judge set a February 2027 trial date, according to court documents that hit the docket this morning...

WaPo's town hall tensions

"Top Washington Post editor Matt Murray acknowledged 'a widespread sense of loss, of genuine trauma' in a contentious town hall meeting with staff" yesterday, The Guardian's Jeremy Barr reports.

Murray's stab at positivity: "The company has been a mess in lots of ways for a long time, but I'm confident stars are aligning in a positive way."

Per Barr, Murray also "played down the number of Post customers who have cancelled their subscriptions in protest against last week’s cuts," saying, "it's been not very heavy, and it's been completely within predicted models and expectations, and completely baked into the plan."

 >> Post veteran Gene Weingarten says ex-publisher and CEO Will Lewis was paid $3 million last year.

Guthrie's Tucson neighbors asked to help

CNN's latest from Tucson: "Residents in Nancy Guthrie's neighborhood have been asked to check their security camera footage from two days in January, according to an alert posted on the Neighbor App by Ring." Here are all the newest updates.

KVOA, the city's NBC affiliate, is encouraging locals to come by and sign this banner:

Via NBC's "Today" show

A delicate ratings question

Morning TV is incredibly competitive, so yes, there has been some curiosity about the ratings for the "Today" show in the week and a half since Nancy disappeared, even though it's an awkward question to ask. Variety's Brian Steinberg has the answer here: Last week, "Today" viewership was "up 23%" compared with the same week last year. "Season to date, 'Today' leads both its main competitors in overall viewers and the audience between 25 and 54..."

About that Gallup news...

Gallup "will no longer track presidential approval ratings after more than eight decades doing so," as The Hill’s Dominick Mastrangelo reports here.

It's a "huge loss for journalists," NYT chief White House correspondent Peter Baker said. Vox's senior politics editor Benjy Sarlin called it "extremely disappointing."

Skeptics immediately suggested a connection between Trump's threats against pollsters and Gallup's many contracts with federal agencies. Trump is, after all, still suing pollster J. Ann Selzer. Gallup said the change merely "reflects an evolution in how Gallup focuses its public research and thought leadership."

AI researchers 'sounding the alarm on their way out the door'

☝