Good afternoon, Press Pass readers. As big legacy media outlets continue to struggle, The Bulwark remains both independent and strong. Our paying subscribers make it possible for us to do the important work you expect (and deserve) from news media without having to worry about the capricious demands of a billionaire owner, for instance. If you’d like to support that mission, as well as receive access to everything we publish plus our incredible online community, please consider upgrading to a Bulwark+ membership at the link below. We’d love to have you along, and if you sign up today, you’ll be able to take an extra 20 percent off the price of a yearlong subscription. Today’s edition takes you into the Capitol moments after the Trump administration failed to indict six Democratic lawmakers who dared to remind members of our armed forces that they can (and must) disobey illegal orders. A few Republicans condemned the administration’s actions, but House Speaker Mike Johnson did not. He actually expressed disappointment that the lawmakers were not indicted. Needless to say, this did not go over well with the targeted Democrats. In addition, another House Republican might leave Congress before his term is up, and the prospect is causing some panic in GOP circles on the Hill. The razor-thin Republican majority could disappear completely if the party loses just one more seat. Lastly, today is the 13-year anniversary of one of the funniest moments in the history of the State of the Union. If you know what I’m talking about without needing to scroll down to check, let me know in the comments. (No points if you read Morning Shots already today—but thanks for reading.) A New Frontier in Timidity for Congressional RepublicansThe Trump administration wants to jail their colleagues. They don’t care.Judge dreadWHAT HAPPENS WHEN your colleagues are targeted in an obviously political investigation to stifle their right to freedom of expression? On Capitol Hill, not much, apparently. Democrats are furious at Republicans for supporting or ignoring the Trump administration’s failed attempt (possibly the first of several) to indict six Democratic House members and senators—all military or intelligence community veterans—for making a video telling U.S. service members that they have a legal and moral duty not to follow unlawful orders. U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeannine Pirro, who reportedly enlisted an inexperienced dance photographer/lawyer to prosecute the case, was unsuccessful in her attempt to convince a grand jury to indict the six Democrats.¹ (Not only did she not convince the grand jury: She reportedly failed to convince even a single member there was probable cause.) A couple of Republicans did manage to publicly speak out against the attempted indictment. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), whose journey towards retirement has coincided with his renewed interest in making occasional breaks with Republican orthodoxy, said, “Political lawfare waged by either side undermines America’s criminal justice system, which is the gold standard of the world. Thankfully in this instance, a jury saw the attempted indictments for what they really were. Political lawfare is not normal, not acceptable, and needs to stop.” “I think our law enforcement people ought to be spending their time on making our community safe and going after real law-breakers,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, quipped to reporters... Join The Bulwark to unlock the rest.Become a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. |