A founder told me: “Our emails are thoughtful. Well-written. Professional.”
Then I opened the sequence.
Every message was perfectly structured.
-
Clear value.
-
Strong CTA.
-
Good social proof.
And completely invisible. Reply rate: 0.4%.
Not terrible. But not meaningful.
The problem wasn’t the copy. It was predictability.
The Radical Idea
Pattern interrupt doesn’t mean being loud.
It means breaking expectation before you sell.
Most cold emails follow this formula: Personalization → Pitch → CTA.
Prospects see the first line and already know the rest.
So we flipped one variable.
We removed the pitch entirely from the first email.
No product mention.
No feature.
No demo ask.
The Real Case
Client sells RevOps tooling to VP Sales.
Instead of: “Noticed you’re scaling your SDR team…”
Subject: Quick sanity check
“Curious how you’re thinking about outbound efficiency this quarter.
– Volume
– Conversion
– Or cost per meeting
Asking because most teams we speak to are over-optimizing one at the expense of
the others.”
No signature banner.
No calendar.
No “we help companies…”
What Happened
Reply rate jumped from 0.4% to 3.1%.
Because it didn’t feel like step one of a funnel.
It felt like a peer question.
“Conversion. Volume is fine but quality’s inconsistent.”
Now we have positioning.
Now we have context.
Now we can sell.
But only after they lean in.
The Insight
The strongest pattern interrupt isn’t shock.
When everyone else is pitching, you create curiosity.
When everyone else is explaining, you create tension.
When everyone else is asking for time, you ask for perspective.
Tactical Shift You Can Test
Email 1 = Insight question
Email 2 = Expand tension
Email 3 = THEN introduce solution
Want me helping you and your team within your sales efforts? Let’s talk.
Or get the Modern
Seller at 60% off now before it's gone in 24 hours!
Alan "Modern Seller" Ruchtein.
Act like +1000 heroes:
|
