I used to think deals stalled because of budget.
Or timing. Or “internal alignment.”
Then I reviewed 27 late-stage opportunities in one quarter.
18 of them had:
- Clear pain
- Confirmed budget
- Engaged champions
- Strong demos
No deadline.
No consequence.
No tension.
Just “We’ll circle back next month.”
Deals don’t close because they make sense.
They close because staying the same feels risky.
The Framework: Urgency. Tension. Scarcity.
Most reps try to manufacture urgency with discounts.
Real urgency is tied to business impact.
1️⃣ Urgency = Time-Based Impact
Urgency isn’t “end of quarter.”
It’s: “What happens if this doesn’t change by X date?”
On discovery, you need this line: “If nothing changes in the next 90 days,
what’s the impact?”
Make them quantify delay.
Revenue lost.
Headcount wasted.
Opportunities missed.
2️⃣ Tension = Consequence
It’s not about the company.
Ask: “If this initiative stalls, how does that reflect on you internally?”
Because now inaction has personal weight.
No tension → comfortable delay.
3️⃣ Scarcity = Limited Access
Scarcity isn’t pretending your calendar is full.
It’s structural limitation.
Examples:
- Limited onboarding capacity
- Implementation windows
- Pricing tied to scope before expansion
- Beta features capped
One client implemented a real onboarding cap: Only 4 enterprise implementations
per quarter.
We communicated that early.
Not because we pressured.
Because buyers realized waiting had consequences.
The Real Case
SaaS company selling into COO at $180K ACV.
We reframed the next call like this:
Rep: “You mentioned delays are costing roughly $20K per month.
If this pushes another quarter, that’s $60K in drag.
Is that acceptable internally?”
COO: “No. That’s not how I want this perceived.”
Then: “We’re allocating two implementation slots this quarter. After that, next
window is June.
Do we want to secure one?”
The Mistake Most Reps Make
They don’t build consequence.
Consequence creates action.
Alan "Modern Seller" Ruchtein.
Act like +1000 heroes:
|