April 28, 2026
john-wilkerson-avatar-teal
Washington Correspondent, D.C. Diagnosis Writer

This is a photo of where I would have been seated at the White House correspondents dinner, had I been invited. I doubt I’d have been in that photo because I would’ve been all the way under the table, including the tablecloth. Send news tips and dinner invitations to John.Wilkerson@statnews.com or John_Wilkerson.07 on Signal.

medicaid

Do work requirements work?

This Friday, Nebraska will become the first state to implement the Medicaid work requirements from the GOP’s tax cut bill. States have until January to put the policy in place.

That got me thinking: how is the government going to keep track of how well work requirements work? Will either state or federal government officials know whether people are knocked off coverage because they’re not working or because they didn’t fill out the paperwork every six months proving that they have a job, are in school, or doing community service? Will they know whether some states are making the process of showing work status needlessly difficult? Is the policy increasing employment?

Turns out, the law doesn’t require states to track this information. This kind of data collection has been done before, during the post-pandemic Medicaid unwinding. States had to report monthly on how that was going. They still do, but those reports are not tailored to work requirements, and it’ll be nigh impossible to study the true impact of the policy.

Read more.



politics

HHS radical transparency? Democrats beg to differ

Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he was “happy to” release, by last Friday, the contract of a longtime vaccine critic hired by the Department of Health and Human Services.

He didn’t, according to Daniel Payne.

Democrats want more information on vaccine critic David Geier, who was hired to review vaccine data. Geier has been given unusual access to confidential data at Kennedy’s behest and was selected to lead a government study on autism.

It’s common for health secretaries to face criticism from the opposing party for not responding to their questions. But Democrats are using Kennedy’s assertions of radical transparency against him, listing a whole lot of outstanding requests.

Read more.


addiction

Trump’s confusing policies on illicit drugs

On April 18, the Trump administration promoted psychedelics as treatments for mental health conditions, and on April 23 Trump’s acting attorney general signed an order reclassifying medical marijuana to a lower tier of scheduled substances. The following day, the FDA gave priority review vouchers to three psychedelic-based mental health treatments.

As Lev Facher put it, the days of ‘Just say no,’ seemed long gone.

But on April 24, the administration announced its opposition to harm reduction services for people who use illicit drugs, Lev reports. In dual letters from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the administration returned to what before Biden was standard drug policy fare: promoting abstinence-first interventions, opposing harm reduction strategies, and viewing law enforcement as a primary tool in reducing drug-related harms.

Read more.


medical devices

RAPID communication with Medicare

Federal regulators announced a new Medicare coverage pathway for breakthrough devices, Mario Aguilar and Katie Palmer report.

The new Regulatory Alignment for Predictable and Immediate Device coverage pathway, or RAPID, will try to synchronize the FDA’s premarket review process and Medicare’s independent process of determining whether to cover devices once on the market.

The program aims to address long-standing industry complaints that it takes too long for Medicare to pay for innovative technology.

Read more about the many open questions about how the program will work in practice.


vaccines

New hep B vaccination policy will be expensive and deadly, researchers project

Last year, a panel of vaccine advisers stacked with vaccine skeptics voted to replace a decades-old recommendation that all babies be vaccinated at birth against hepatitis B.

The new policy, which recommends giving the birth dose only to babies perceived to be at risk of neonatal infection, will lead to increased numbers of infected infants and more cases of chronic hepatitis B infection in children that will generate millions of extra dollars in health care costs, according to two studies, Helen Branswell reports.

Read more.


More around STAT
Check out more exclusive coverage with a STAT+ subscription
Read premium in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis with all of our STAT+ articles.

What we’re reading

  • Doctor, wife of acting U.S. attorney general, appointed to NIH advisory council, STAT
  • Supreme Court grapples with multibillion-dollar wave of lawsuits over Roundup cancer claims, Associated Press
  • Nancy Cox, a CDC veteran and a stalwart in global flu research, dies at 77, STAT
  • The groups backing RFK Jr. are running low on cash, Politico