Carl Fritjofsson, who has run Stockholm, Sweden-based Creandum’s San Francisco office since 2016, says the timeline for European founders to cross the pond is compressing at a pace he’s never seen.
“There is more demand in the U.S. today than there is in Europe,” he told
Fortune. “Especially if you’re selling towards enterprises with some kind of AI-native product. That is pulling people to do the U.S. expansion faster than ever before.”
The pull factor is real: AI firms captured
61% of global venture capital in 2025—and
80% to 81% of total global venture capital in the first quarter of 2026. The overwhelming majority of that demand lives on American enterprise procurement budgets.
Receipts from Creandum’s own portfolio make the case. Lovable, the Swedish
vibe-coding startup Creandum backed early, crossed
$400 million in ARR in February—adding $100 million in a single month with 146 employees—and sits at a
$6.6 billion valuation. The company’s growth is nearly entirely digital and borderless, a model Fritjofsson describes as “bottoms-up from day one”—no boots on the ground required, as U.S. users have flocked to the platform without a U.S. expansion plan.
But not every company gets to grow the way Lovable did. For enterprise-focused startups, “ready for the U.S.” still means putting a founder on a plane—and that’s where the playbook gets complicated. Fritjofsson acknowledged that the Trump administration’s visa friction is real, even if he’s not ready to call it a dealbreaker.
Last September, the administration imposed
a
$100,000 fee for new H-1B applications—a more than 6,500% cost increase. For founders, the practical workaround has been the O-1 visa, the “extraordinary ability” category that Fritjofsson describes as working pretty well. For the team members they want to bring along? The path is murkier.
Yet Fritjofsson’s read is that the deregulatory tailwind for AI is outweighing the immigration headwind. “What Trump has done is also make the U.S. more AI-friendly when it comes to regulation,” he said. “The lessening friction on the commercial side has driven more demand than the additional friction on immigration has slowed it.”
His take appears to track with the data: European venture funding reached
$58 billion in 2025, a modest 9% gain year-over-year, while U.S. companies captured
83% of global venture capital in Q1 2026 alone. The gravitational pull of American AI enterprise demand isn’t a narrative—it’s a funding gap. Europe’s structural challenge runs deeper than visa policy. A
2024 report by Interface found that European countries are “losing significant AI talent, both national and international,” to the U.S. One mapping of global AI professionals found Europe has roughly
30% more AI talent per capita than the U.S.—they just don’t always stay. Fritjofsson frames it as a two-way flow—many researchers eventually build back in Europe (like Cast AI)—but by later growth stages,
73% of European AI companies’ lead investors are American, which tells you where the capital conviction still lives.
Klarna’s U.S. story—which required
rebuilding the product nearly from the ground up for the American market before U.S. revenue grew 58% year-over-year—is the old playbook. Lovable hitting $400 million ARR without a traditional expansion strategy, is the new one.
And so it seems the question every European founder should be asking right now isn’t when to go to the U.S. It’s whether AI has already made the question obsolete.
See you tomorrow,
Lily Mae Lazarus
X:@LilyMaeLazarusEmail:lily.lazarus@fortune.comSubmit a deal for the Term Sheet newsletter
here.
Joey Abrams curated the deals section of today’s newsletter.Subscribe here.
