|
 |
Hi, y’all. Welcome back to The Opposition and happy Fathers Day! If you are a last-minute gift giver like I am, don’t fret. There’s still a few hours left in the day to gift dad a Bulwark+ membership straight to his inbox.
In all seriousness, The Bulwark has become an important part of my parents’ news diet (and it’s not just because their daughter works here!). After the 2024 election—with some gentle prodding from their kids—my parents were two of the many people who came to the realization they’d been spending too much mindless time watching cable news. So they made the bold decision to cut the cord. It’s mostly been positive (except for when I was visiting last weekend and had no way to watch the World Cup). And that’s largely because TheBulwark has provided them with rich reporting, analysis, and commentary.
So I hope you’ll think about a Bulwark+ membership. Not only is it a great gift that helps ease the cable news addiction, but because the support of our members makes all our journalism possible.
—Lauren
The Era of Deepfakes Is Giving Democrats Heartache
Candidates are increasingly faced with a question: respond to an AI attack ad and give it attention, or ignore it and risk that it voters believe it.
|
| ||||||||||||
 |
EARLIER THIS MONTH, the Trump-aligned super PAC Citizens for Sanity released an ad attacking James Talarico on trans issues.
That wasn’t a surprise. After all, Republican culture-war attacks against Democrats are about as dog-bites-man as it gets in politics. What stood out about the ad was the content. It was AI-generated, depicting Talarico as Maria von Trapp from The Sound of Music, singing¹ about how he wants to change “the gender of all your offspring,” set to the tune of “My Favorite Things.”
Citizens for Sanity didn’t seem to have any hesitation about releasing such a spot. In fact, the group proudly leaked that they were putting six figures behind it.
That left Talarico’s campaign with a decision to make. It could forcefully condemn the ad or even threaten legal action against the group. But doing so would risk a Streisand effect, drawing more attention to the very content it wanted to bury. Alternatively, it could ignore the ad, confident that voters would not see it or would dismiss it if they did. But that risked allowing the spot to gain traction with no pushback.
The campaign chose...
Join The Bulwark to unlock the rest.
Become a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
| Unlimited access to articles and newsletters including The Triad by JVL and Receipts by Catherine Rampell. | |
| Ad-free editions of our shows (with transcripts) and member-only shows like The Secret Podcast. | |
| Plus community chats and commenting features. Your support helps keep our work sustainable and available to those who cannot afford a membership. Cancel anytime. |