But there's a glaring omission in the new laws ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

AU Edition - Today's top story: New laws to make tech companies pay for news will help, but there are 4 key problems View in browser

14 August 2026

AU Edition

 

One morning in February 2021, Australians opened their Facebook and Instagram feeds to get their daily news fix only to find no news at all. Meta, the platforms’ parent company, had blocked many news accounts (plus a lot of other accounts) to protest the government’s attempt to make tech companies pay for the news they use.

Despite the temporary news blackout, Meta and Google ended up signing onto the laws, called the news media bargaining code. News outlets struck deals with tech companies worth millions of dollars to help fund newsroom jobs and operations. But by 2025, the deals weren’t renewed, leaving media outlets back at square one.

Now the government has tabled replacement laws, this time called the News Bargaining Incentive. If tech companies don’t make ongoing deals with at least eight news outlets, they must pay a fee. Revenue generated through the scheme will fund journalism.

As Caroline Fisher and Sora Park write, the new legislation brings many benefits for newsrooms. But it’s far from perfect, especially because it notably excludes AI companies, which are increasingly providing Australians with their daily dose of headlines.

 

Erin Cooper-Douglas

Public Policy Editor

 

New laws to make tech companies pay for news will help, but there are 4 key problems

Caroline Fisher, University of Canberra; Sora Park, University of Canberra

While setting up new revenue streams for struggling newsrooms is a welcome move, the laws themselves are far from perfect.

Why the $2.5 billion Tomago aluminium deal is no ordinary bailout

Roy Green, University of Technology Sydney

The government’s approach to saving Tomago offers a blueprint for other interventions to future-proof industry, such as at Whyalla.

Why Meta is paying for controversial content – and what that means for the posts you see

Toija Cinque, Deakin University

Paying for engaging content is not the same as intending to fund extremism, but it creates a risk that harmful content will benefit.

Grattan on Friday: Albanese doesn’t believe in admitting he’s stuffed up, and it costs him

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas flourishes where Albanese flounders.

Friday essay: we’re all ‘political’ now – but can that lead to real change?

Intifar Chowdhury, Flinders University

In our age of ‘hyperpolitics’, what does meaningful change look like? Anton Jäger’s buzzy new book has some answers – but could go harder on neoliberalism.

The Coalition wants to see more Indigenous students go to private schools. Is this a smart idea?

Jessa Rogers, The University of Melbourne

The Coalition wants to looks at ‘what works’ in Indigenous education and ‘roll it out more broadly’ .

Pauline Hanson calls Australia ‘Judeo-Christian’. But the term is a meaningless modern invention

Philip C. Almond, The University of Queensland

There is no such thing as ‘Judeo-Christian values’. The term hides essential differences between Judaism and Christianity.

Two subsea cables off Perth suffer ‘concerning’ damage. Lasers could help protect them

Bill Corcoran, Monash University; Allison Kealy, Swinburne University of Technology; Arnan Mitchell, RMIT University; Luke H. Broadley, RMIT University

Australia’s access to the global internet depends on a surprisingly small number of undersea cables.

Storms of dust and sand are another sign our climate is changing. Two experts explain

Tegan Clark, Australian National University; Isabelle Finlay, Loughborough University

These fine particles can do significant harm to transport networks, farming and even human health.

Politics + Society

Health + Medicine

Education

Environment + Energy

Science + Technology

Arts + Culture

Your Say

I totally agree that anyone, including students, should have the right to protest whatever they like. However, why not do it on a Saturday? School is compulsory after all, and students need to get an education, not an indoctrination by the National Union of Students. The union should make their underlying political leanings clear. Students should be getting an education that fairly and in an unbiased way looks at both sides of the political spectrum.

Karen Galvin