Green Daily
Less climate-friendly skies |
Bloomberg

Today’s newsletter looks at how airlines are facing a reality check as they try to reduce emissions with green jet fuel. You can also read and share this story on Bloomberg.com. For unlimited access to climate and energy news, please subscribe

Soaring higher

By Ben Elgin

British Airways’ parent company IAG SA surged ahead of other passenger airlines last year to consume the most sustainable aviation fuel, or SAF, according to a Bloomberg Green review of corporate filings from dozens of air carriers.

The company acquired 55 million gallons of cleaner jet fuel, which is derived from lower-emitting sources such as used cooking oil and animal tallow. That number exceeded the amount used by all US passenger airlines combined.

But the promising performance is overshadowed by a troubling reality for the industry: The shift to SAF is still minuscule, while growth in passenger air travel is drowning out any climate gains so far. For example, despite IAG’s world-leading status, cleaner fuel accounted for only about 1.9% of its overall fuel consumption last year, and its emissions from fuel combustion still rose by 5%.

Globally, SAF is expected to increase to 0.7% from 0.3% of aviation fuel this year. But the International Air Transport Association expects air travel to climb 6%, causing another jump in emissions.

“We’re still at the very beginning of this market,” said Daisy Robinson, a BloombergNEF analyst who focuses on renewable fuels. “It’s going to take some time.” 

Read more: Global Air Travel Surges While Switch to Clean Jet Fuel Lags

New rules are springing up in different parts of the world to spur more use of SAF, which costs at least twice as much as conventional jet fuel. Starting this year, the European Union and the UK require jet fuel to include at least 2% SAF. Other requirements have been enacted or planned in British Columbia, Brazil, Indonesia and Singapore.

Such rules help protect first movers from being undercut on prices by competitors. “As airlines, because of competition, we’re not great at doing this voluntarily,” said Aaron Robinson, IAG’s vice president for sustainable aviation fuels in the US. “Mandates in different geographies can play a really important role in moving the whole aviation industry forward.”

In the US, where no mandates are planned and where President Donald Trump’s recent tax bill reduced incentives for SAF, airlines have fallen behind the market leaders (despite some heavily advertising their pursuit of greener fuels).

Alaska Air Group Inc. leapt to the front of US carriers last year by increasing its SAF usage more than tenfold to 0.68% of its fuel. That’s about double the percentage of several other big US airlines, including JetBlue Airways Corp., United Airlines Holdings Inc. and Delta Air Lines Inc. It’s nearly 10 times the percentage of American Airlines Group Inc., which used only 0.07% SAF. (When including cargo carriers, DHL Group led the world by using SAF for 3.52% of its jet fuel last year.) 

Businesses that spend a lot on corporate travel, such as tech firms and consulting companies, helped pay for more than half of Alaska’s SAF last year. This enables companies such as Microsoft Corp. and Autodesk Inc. to claim a smaller carbon footprint. Microsoft shaved its emissions by 65,000 tons last year by helping cover the cost of greener fuels, including for some employee flights on Alaska.

It’s not clear, though, how many more companies will step up, especially given the high cost of cleaner jet fuel, compared with other options to rein in emissions. Ryan Spies, managing director of sustainability for Alaska, estimates that businesses pay between $150 to $300 for each ton of CO2 that they avoid through SAF purchases. By comparison, carbon offsets sold for an average of about $6.30 per ton last year, according to Ecosystem Marketplace (though many offset projects have delivered fewer climate benefits than advertised).

“This pool might not be that deep,” Spies said. “The only way to bring these [cost] numbers down is to invest in these technologies.”

Global SAF production continues to lurch forward at an uneven clip. While analysts say there’s plenty of green fuel to hit the 2% mandates in Europe this year, vastly more will be needed for airlines to reach their widely held goals of 10% SAF by 2030.

A couple of new plants began churning out cleaner fuels last year, including a large Texas facility from Diamond Green Diesel, which is a joint venture between Valero Energy Corp. and Darling Ingredients Inc. Meanwhile, World Energy’s first-in-the-country SAF plant in Paramount, California, has been shut down for months following the loss of financial backing from Air Products and Chemicals Inc. A World Energy spokesperson said there’s no timetable for restarting the plant.

Passenger air travel is expected to double by 2050, which is set to cause aviation emissions to rise. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Perhaps the biggest disappointment for airlines has been the retreat of oil giants, which previously trumpeted massive commitments in this area. BP Plc, for instance, said two years ago that it was pursuing five projects around the world that would produce 50,000 barrels of renewable fuels per day, with a focus on SAF. The oil major has since scaled back most of these plans amid a renewed focus on fossil fuels. BP didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Read more: BP Puts Brakes on Plan to Make Clean Jet Fuel at Spanish Plant

“We need to make sure that some of these bigger players are really investing in the new facilities,” said Hemant Mistry, director of net zero transition for IATA. “They’re the ones who have the technical expertise, the experience, and they have the balance sheets, as well.”

Passenger air travel is expected to double by 2050, which will likely cause emissions to soar. While airlines are counting heavily on cleaner fuels to save the day — IATA anticipates SAF could be 80% to 90% of the fuel supply by mid-century — others are more pessimistic. BloombergNEF, for instance, predicts that scarce feedstocks and a lack of new plants will limit these cleaner fuels to about 7% of the industry’s propellant by 2050. 

Considering these challenges, some in the industry are pushing it to shift its focus beyond SAF and to address the thorny issue of ever-rising passenger numbers. “Limiting or even questioning growth, that is difficult for airlines,” said Karel Bockstael, a former vice president of sustainability at KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, who retired in 2022 after 32 years at the company.

Bockstael last year co-founded the group Call Aviation to Action, which has the support of over 400 current and former aviation insiders, including from fuel producers, airports and airlines. They’re urging the industry to set firm limits for its emissions and to support more aggressive policies to stay within these boundaries. This could include levies on frequent flyers or carbon taxes on jet fuel.

“We’re not against the industry, we love it, we know all the benefits of it,” said Bockstael. “But if we do not have a strategy — if we do not have a way out when planetary boundaries are forced upon us — then we will have serious problems, and our industry will have a tragic hard landing.”

Read and share this story with your friends and followers on Bloomberg.com. 

Cost of compliance

S$200 million
Singapore Airlines Ltd. has warned it faces more than this ($156 million) by 2030 in climate-related compliance costs, which include the use of credits under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation.

Does 'jet zero' work?

"You are growing something that doesn't have the option of being decarbonized right now."
Alice Larkin
Professor of climate science and energy policy at the University of Manchester
Experts have said the UK government's plan to achieve net zero by 2050 doesn't work with current emissions reduction technologies for the aviation sector, as they won't develop fast enough to offset the rise in flights. 

More from Green

The massive economic stimulus and boost to clean power from a 1.2 trillion yuan ($167 billion) mega-dam in Tibet has proven convincing enough for Chinese leaders to set aside concerns about potential damage to biodiversity and the impact on relations with India.

Chinese Premier Li Qiang launched construction of the hydropower project, which is three times the size of the Three Gorges Dam, on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo river on Saturday. He also unveiled the China Yajiang Group, a new company that will manage the dam’s development, according to the official Xinhua News Agency.

While much is still unknown about the project, its cost alone shows the epic scale engineers are envisioning, with the estimate more than four times larger than the $37 billion that Three Gorges cost upon completion in 2009. That promises an economic jolt for sectors like construction, cement and steel, and a major new source of clean power that could eventually help the country reach its goal of net zero emissions by 2060.

A section of the Yarlung Tsangpo River in Tibet. Photographer: China News Service/China News Service

Climate change is adding to food inflation. Researchers from the Barcelona Supercomputing Center and the European Central Bank have traced price jumps, such as a 300% spike in Australian lettuce prices, to extreme weather linked to climate change.

The European Central Bank has warned Credit Agricole that it’s among firms that may be fined after failing to meet the supervisor’s expectations for managing climate risks, according to people familiar with the matter. The lender is contesting the penalty and a final decision has yet to be made on whether the fine will stand, the people said.

Greece will establish two national marine parks in an effort to protect ocean wildlife. The parks will be located in the Ionian Sea and in the Southern Cyclades, an island group in the Aegean Sea. The Greek government’s pledge to create a marine park in the Aegean Sea drew pushback from Turkey last year. The two countries have historically been at odds over sea borders.

Worth a listen

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act cuts almost $500 billion in US clean-energy spending, just as the country was starting to get serious about its climate goals. Some say the country is acting like a petrostate, waging war against clean energy. Others are more sanguine and believe that the US will stay the course in the long term. On the latest episode of Zero, Akshat Rathi is joined by Jigar Shah, a clean energy expert and former head of the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office, to make sense of the bill’s impacts, and whether it’s as bad for climate as it seems.

Listen now, and subscribe on AppleSpotify, or YouTube to get new episodes of Zero every Thursday.

Contractors install solar panels at the Phillips 66 Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex in Rodeo, California, in 2024.  Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

More from Bloomberg

  • Business of Food for a weekly look at how the world feeds itself in a changing economy and climate, from farming to supply chains to consumer trends
  • Hyperdrive for expert insight into the future of cars
  • Energy Daily for a daily guide to the energy and commodities markets that power the global economy
  • CityLab Daily for top stories, ideas and solutions, from cities around the world
  • Tech In Depth for analysis and scoops about the business of technology

Explore all Bloomberg newsletters.

Follow Us

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.


Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Green Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent </div