The U.S.-Russia summit is already a win for Putin
Plus: The tiny White House club making major national-security decisions

David A. Graham

Staff writer

After blowing off Donald Trump’s deadlines to cease hostilities in Ukraine, the Russian leader was rewarded with a visit to American soil. Why would he worry about new ultimatums?

First, here are three new stories from The Atlantic:

A Win in Itself

(Getty)

View in browser

In Ukraine, the battle lines long ago calcified into a stalemate, with Russian invaders moving forward incrementally and occasionally getting pushed back. In the diplomatic sphere, however, the territory is shifting fast.

When Donald Trump meets Russia’s Vladimir Putin today in Anchorage, Alaska, the summit will be the latest in a series of concessions by the American president. Trump’s affection for Putin has waned—“I got along well with Putin,” he said this week, conspicuously adopting the past tense—as his frustration with the ongoing war waxes. Yet by inviting Putin to meet, he’s allowing Russia to further protract the conflict.

During the 2024 presidential election, Trump vowed that he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours—or even before taking office. After those targets were far in the rearview, with no resolution in sight, he more than promised vague important developments in his trademark two-week increments. More recently, on July 28, he issued Putin a deadline of “10 or 12 days” to cease hostilities, and the following day, he narrowed that down: 10 days, or by August 8. On the day that the ultimatum ran out, Trump announced he’d meet Putin in person, despite no end to the violence.

For the Russian autocrat, this is a win in itself. Putin is a global pariah facing an international warrant for his arrest, but the United States is welcoming him to American soil for the first time since 2015. (The U.S. has never had much respect for international justice structures, but the Trump administration is particularly dismissive of them.) Without stopping his aggression against Ukraine, and despite blowing through a series of deadlines, he gets a photo op with Trump. Putin praised what he called quite energetic and sincere efforts toward peace by his American counterpart, which is more than anyone can say for Putin himself.

What’s in it for the president? As my colleagues Vivian Salama, Michael Scherer, and Jonathan Lemire reported last weekend, Trump has grand dreams of a legacy as a peacemaker—perhaps even one with a Nobel Prize. This gives Trump some reason for patience with Putin. But the expectations for this summit keep getting lowered. Initially, the White House allowed suggestions of a tentative peace deal—or at least a genuine cease-fire—to spread in the media.

Now the White House says that Trump will be in Alaska for a “listening exercise,” with Trump saying, “All I want to do is set the table for the next meeting.” He acknowledged this week that the U.S. doesn’t have many levers to pull to stop the killings of Ukrainian civilians. “I’ve had a lot of good conversations with him,” Trump said, referring to Putin. “Then I go home and I see that a rocket hit a nursing home, or a rocket hit an apartment building and people are laying dead in the street.” It was a notable acknowledgment of limitations from a leader who prefers bluster, but Trump does often respond to images he sees on the news.

Earlier this week, Trump suggested that he might push a deal that ends the conflict by swapping territory between the countries. This would be a sweetheart deal for Putin, who would acquire legal control of large swaths of rich Ukrainian land he has already seized illegally by force. The idea received an angry response from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who is not invited to the Alaska meeting—itself another win for Putin (though Trump has floated the possibility of Zelensky joining him and Putin in Alaska later). European leaders, who have sought to ease Trump toward their position of support for Kyiv, spoke with him earlier this week, and they said afterward that Trump would not offer any such deal.

But Trump still has little love lost with Zelensky. The men have improved their relationship since Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance berated Zelensky in the Oval Office early this year, but Trump’s interest in Ukraine is purely instrumental—a way to earn plaudits for peace—just as it was when he tried to get Zelensky to assist his 2020 reelection campaign by opening an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden.

Trump, meanwhile, has been embarrassingly acquiescent to Putin in past conversations. During a March 2018 phone call, he congratulated Putin on his victory in an election almost universally viewed as illegitimate, despite an all-caps reminder atop his briefing sheet that warned, “DO NOT CONGRATULATE.” This was just a teaser for a meeting four months later in Helsinki, during which Trump accepted Putin’s claim that Russia hadn’t interfered in the 2016 election, and indicated that he trusted Putin over the U.S. intelligence community’s consensus view. Today, Trump is meeting with Putin one-on-one, without aides who might help keep him on track.

Trump’s posture in Anchorage will go some way toward revealing how serious and durable his disaffection with Putin is. But it won’t end the war, and it may not even offer much progress toward a resolution. On Wednesday, Trump warned that there would be “very severe consequences” if Russia didn’t stop the war, but he declined to outline them: “I don’t have to say.” That’s unlikely to rattle Putin, who knows how to call a bluff. But at least it doesn’t give him another specific deadline to mock.

Related:

Today’s News

  1. President Donald Trump arrived in Alaska this morning for his one-on-one meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia, aiming to broker a cease-fire in the Ukraine war, and warned he was “not going to be happy” if Russia refuses to cooperate today.
  2. Texas Governor Greg Abbott called a second special session after Democrats left the state to block GOP redistricting efforts. Though the chamber still did not meet the necessary quorum, House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he expects to reach it Monday and warned Democrats they could face civil arrest if they return to their homes in Texas earlier than Monday.
  3. Washington, D.C., Attorney General Brian Schwalb sued the Trump administration over its move to take control of the D.C. police and appoint an emergency police commissioner.

Dispatches

Explore all of our newsletters here.


More From The Atlantic

Evening Read

(Illustration by Nico Krijno)

One of the highlights of my first three years as a literature profess