|
Sept. 8, 2025
| This week’s compliance news and insights for HR leaders
The company established it would become less competitive if employees who promote its medical devices could not work in person at healthcare facilities, according to a court ruling.
|
The lawsuit is a test of the high court’s Groff v. DeJoy precedent, which clarified the standard by which religious accommodations must be evaluated.
|
The employee said he was allegedly forced to “create business processes and technical tools that were being weaponized to facilitate discrimination against transgender employees” like himself.
|
The agency published its full Spring 2025 regulatory agenda Thursday, nearly a month after apparently removing an earlier version from a White House website.
|
The group cannot be required “to make accommodations for abortions, contraception, sterilization, artificial reproductive technologies, or surrogacy” in violation of their religious beliefs, the court said.
|
The move comes amid a growing national debate over AI laws that are piling up at the state level, creating a complex patchwork of requirements for businesses.
|
The case involves a legal doctrine — cat’s paw theory — invoked by federal courts in numerous employment discrimination challenges.
|
What We're Reading
The Employer Handbook
|
Hollywood Reporter
|
Ogletree Deakins
|
Dive Into a Topic
| 