There are a lot of perfectly reasonable explanations for why, regardless of the health risks, Gen Z is tanning like crazy. Young people tend not to worry about the long-term health risks of their behavior (and given the fact that the only conversations middle-aged people have are about streaming shows and our latest ailments, one can understand the desire to delay worrying). Maybe tans draw more likes and views on TikTok and Instagram. But I wonder if there’s not something more disturbing behind the latest numbers on sun habits from the American Academy of Dermatology. “Only 25 percent of Gen Z respondents (ages 18 to 29) reported concern about developing skin cancer in their lifetime, compared with 39 percent of the general population. What’s more, 20 percent said that getting a tan was more important than preventing skin cancer.” NYT (Gift Article): They’ve Heard the Warnings. Gen Z Is Tanning Anyway. In this age of attacks on science, maybe young people don’t really believe in the dangers of excessive sun exposure. In this age of misinformation, maybe young people buy the takes from some of their peers on TikTok, like, “The sun gives you cancer. Sunscreen gives you cancer. We die either way, so you may as well be tanned.” In this age of a rightful distrust of sullied government information and quack leaders, maybe young people don’t feel like taking skincare health tips from institutions when our Department of Health and Human Services is being run by a tanning bed enthusiast who has turned himself into a human McNugget (I hate to throw shade, but in this case, it’s for his own health). Perhaps related to an absence of trust in institutions, “Gen Z respondents cited TikTok or Instagram as their No. 1 source for skin-care information, and 65 percent of them were likely to believe tanning myths, including that a base tan can prevent sunburn or reduce the risk of skin cancer.” As their government unleashes flavored vapes, unbridled gambling, and climate policies that risk the future, would young people be wrong to question whether the olds really have their best interests at heart? Between the lack of trust in their elders and the endless stream of misinformation, would it be any wonder if young people didn’t know what to believe, and would be left with a desire to just let it all burn (including their skin)? 2Steamroll of the Dice“Last fall, a high-stakes struggle unfolded inside the red brick walls of an obscure federal agency. Three companies — each with ties to the Trump family’s business empire — needed the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to bless their ambitions in the white-hot field of prediction markets.” You can probably predict what happened. NYT (Gift Article): How Prediction Markets and Crypto Firms Steamrolled a Watchdog Agency. “By Christmas, the agency had put two top officials who had raised questions about the companies on leave, barred them from the office and placed them under internal investigation. Three other senior officials who had enforced laws involving cryptocurrencies — another industry linked to the Trumps — suffered the same fate. None of those officials were told what they had done wrong. But current and former agency staffers said in interviews that the commission’s work force took away a clear message: Don’t cause trouble for those industries.” 3Devils and Details“The negotiations between the United States and Iran to end their war are following President Trump’s familiar playbook for resolving a Middle East crisis: agree to a cease-fire and deal with the toughest problems later.” For now, we’re getting mixed signals of new US strikes and suggestions that a peace deal of some sort is close. Here’s the latest from the NYT and The Guardian. 4Pontiff Pontificates“So-called artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean ... The various kinds of job insecurity, fragmented career paths and automation must not be evaluated solely in terms of efficiency, but in relation to the dignity of the worker, the right to sufficient remuneration and the genuine possibility of participating in society ... I ask everyone to abandon the construction of yet another Tower of Babel and to join forces in building up the common good.” Count the Pope among those who are very worried about the rise of artificial intelligence. Magnifica Humanitas is the Pope’s first encyclical — a 42,300-word open letter on the need to put humans at the heart of technological change. (We might need a new data center wing to edit that down to a length modern readers will actually consume.) Main Takeaways From Pope Leo’s Encyclical on AI. 5Extra, ExtraRace to Racism: Federal court blocks Alabama plan for new congressional districts that could help Republicans. “A three-judge panel in the state’s long-running redistricting case issued a preliminary injunction that prevents the state from switching maps, ruling that the Republican-backed plan ‘intentionally discriminated based on race.’” (Of course, that’s precisely what the Supreme Court just allowed, so one imagines they’ll chime in soon, with the midterms quickly approaching.) |