Top headlines
Lead story
President Donald Trump won a victory at the Supreme Court late Monday, according to headlines. But those headlines overstated what happened.
The case concerned Trump’s executive order from March that aimed to dramatically limit mail and absentee voting, and a lawsuit mounted by states against the order. Yet the conservative majority’s ruling was one that – while granting the president a win on procedure – did not in fact address the legality of his executive order. That is still to come.
Confused? So was I. So I asked Quinnipiac University election law expert John J. Martin to explain what was going on.
In my interview with Martin, he reviews the background of the case, the various players involved in challenging the order and what could happen next. As the 2026 midterms approach, says Martin, “Election officials need to know how they’re supposed to manage their elections, and they need to know this months in advance. They want to know: Are we actually able to implement mail voting, or absentee voting, the way that we’ve always done it?”
[ Science from the scientists themselves. Sign up for our weekly science email newsletter. ]