industry intel
Why the health industry is actually optimistic about ACA subsidies
Enhanced tax credits that help millions of middle-income Americans afford health plans on the ACA’s individual marketplaces expire at the end of 2025. Conservatives have railed against those subsidies as wasteful spending, but ending them has huge implications, as Bob Herman writes.
That’s why hospital and insurance executives are banking on President-elect Trump and congressional Republicans not killing the program. They are betting that GOP lawmakers and the president won’t want to take the blame if millions of people who currently get these subsidies — many of whom live in red states — suddenly find themselves with coverage they can’t afford.
This optimism isn’t necessarily rooted in political analysis, Bob writes. It’s financial, and those figures say a lot for the industry. More from him.
vaccine policy
How vaccine liability works, and what RFK Jr. wants to do
Kennedy has criticized laws that provide companies that make vaccines with protections from lawsuits. If he takes office, he has broad power to strip those protections, Rachel Cohrs Zhang writes.
Manufacturers of most routine vaccines have had protections from lawsuits for nearly 40 years, and makers of vaccines developed to address emergencies have enjoyed protections for 20. That set of laws was vaulted into controversy during the Covid-19 pandemic. RFK Jr. soon harnessed that energy and criticized legal protections for vaccine makers.
Experts told Rachel that an HHS secretary, as he could soon be, could disrupt vaccine liability protections without turning to Congress. Read more.
opinion section
Opinion: Why I call RFK Jr. Anti-vaxx
Jonathan Berman, a scientist who has studied and written about the anti-vaccine movement, weighed in on STAT yesterday about his RFK Jr. concerns and why he won’t shy away from calling the HHS nominee an anti-vaxxer.
Berman argued that some, including RFK Jr. himself, have already begun whitewashing his positions on vaccines and vaccination policy. He dives into the nominee’s long history with vaccine theories and health care, writing, “if someone consistently opposes vaccination, promotes vaccine misinformation, and works to dismantle vaccine programs, then the label ‘anti-vaxxer’ fits, regardless of how they describe themselves.” More from Berman.