World leaders and major investors have spent the two weeks since the US election wondering whether President-elect Donald Trump will follow through fully on his campaign threats to impose universal tariffs. The latest trade worrier was hedge-fund titan Ken Griffin, who appeared Monday at the Oxford Union in the UK and said he was “very anxious” about Trump’s potential use of tariffs. But the billionaire sounded optimistic that the new White House will deal with “regulatory overreach” and help the US economy go back to “the business of business.” Read More: Trump Win Heaps Pain on European Investors Long Used to Losing At Bloomberg’s “Future of Greek Finance Symposium” in Athens yesterday, European Central Bank Governing Council member Yannis Stournaras said this about American intentions to boost import taxes: “If I can advise our friends in the United States, this is my advice: don’t do it.” Speaking to a committee in Parliament’s upper chamber yesterday, UK Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said that tariffs on British exports to the US would be “a difficult thing for us to have to contend with” given the stakes — a bilateral trade relationship worth the £300 billion ($380 billion). BE’s Base Case But the concern about the worst-case scenario from Trump’s trade policies might be overblown, according to a new analysis from Bloomberg Economics. (Click here to read the full report on the Terminal.) The base case from Bloomberg Economics sees Trump raising the aggregate US weighted tariff by 5 percentage points to 8% by the end of 2026 — with China getting hit hardest. “That’s a meaningful increase, though well short of what Trump proposed on the campaign trail,” Anna Wong, BE’s chief US economist, and BE economist Nicole Gorton-Caratelli, wrote in their report. QuickTake: Why Trump’s Plan to Escalate Tariffs Has Many Haters Part of their expectations stem from the battle playing out this week over who will get the top economic posts in Trump’s administration. Names like Scott Bessent, Howard Lutnick, Kevin Warsh, Kevin Hassett — heavy hitters in finance and economics who are far more familiar to Wall Street than to Main Street — don’t sound like particularly hawkish picks when it comes to China and protectionism. “Once the president-elect takes office, we expect to see a less extreme version of those promises,” the BE economists wrote. “That range of candidates suggests to us that a Trump II administration could include voices to counterbalance tariff hardliners like former US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer.” —Brendan Murray in London Click here for more of Bloomberg.com’s most-read stories about trade, supply chains and shipping. |