Publication excerpt
"The investor-State panorama remains one that is complex. While global macroeconomic factors continue to give rise to growth in investor-State arbitrations, many States are taking steps to reduce their exposure to investment treaty disputes by withdrawing from investment treaties, or concluding treaties with no or limited investor-State dispute mechanisms. At the same time, legislative reform and judicial decisions around the world reflect a general willingness to enforce international arbitration awards – except when the awards concern intra-European disputes, where the approach of courts varies significantly."
- Tafadzwa Pasipanodya, Foley Hoag
|
|
|
About the contributing editor
Tafadzwa Pasipanodya
Foley Hoag
Tafadzwa Pasipanodya is a Partner in the international litigation and arbitration department of Foley Hoag LLP, and chair of its Africa practice. She has represented sovereign States and State entities from all over the world in international disputes before the International Court of Justice, the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea, and arbitration tribunals constituted pursuant to various arbitral rules, including ICSID, UNCITRAL, the ICC and the SCC. |
|
|
|
|
|
About the International Comparative Legal Guide (ICLG) series:
Since 2003, the ICLG series has been providing practical insights and intelligence on cross-border law to professionals worldwide. The series is divided into 58 key practice areas, each featuring a set of directly comparable, annually updated Q&A chapters covering key jurisdictions, as well as expert analysis chapters giving detailed commentary on issues and trends of global importance.
To become a contributor, please get in touch.
|
|
|
GLOBAL LEGAL GROUP 59 Tanner Street, London, SE1 3PL, UK |
|
|
|
|
|
