EMPLOYERS’ ASKS
— Groups representing employers that offer health insurance are gearing up to defend and try to bolster the largest source of health coverage for people under 65 in the U.S., your host reports. Donald Trump’s election and Republican majorities in Congress have raised some uncertainty on what’s coming down the pike for employer-sponsored health insurance, which covers almost 165 million Americans. Some conservative think tanks with ties to Trump, including the Paragon Health Institute, have floated capping the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health insurance, which exempts employer contributions to premiums from federal income and payroll taxes. Right-leaning groups argue the exclusion costs the government hundreds of billions of dollars in tax revenue and drives up health care prices.
But employer groups vehemently oppose capping or getting rid of the tax exclusion, arguing the move could spur some companies to no longer offer health insurance amid affordability concerns. The groups said they will lobby the Trump administration and lawmakers in Congress to keep the tax exclusion in place. “If that was to actually go through, I think there's a significant existential threat to employer sponsored insurance,” said Shawn Gremminger, president and CEO of the National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions. Here are employers’ other priorities for the incoming administration: Enhanced transparency and competition: Employer groups hope Trump will build on efforts from his first term to increase transparency in health care pricing, which the groups say encourage employers to negotiate lower health costs. The first Trump administration mandated that insurers and hospitals publicly post the prices they negotiate for medical services, but compliance with the regulations has lagged, and efforts to codify these regulations in Congress have stalled.
“If we're going to address lowering health care costs for employers and working families, then it’s really trying to address some of those root causes that are driving rising health care costs: namely, a lack of transparency and hospital consolidation,” said Ilyse Schuman, senior vice president of health policy for the American Benefits Council. Reevaluating mental health parity: Employers also want the Trump administration to take a fresh look at the Biden administration’s mental health parity rule, which requires insurers to cover mental health and substance use treatment on the same level as other types of care. Insurers and employers have argued that workforce shortages are the main drivers of barriers to mental health care and that the Biden administration’s rule could lower quality of care for patients and increase costs for employers.
“We think that that rule is completely unworkable, and we are happy to tell anybody who is listening all about the problems with that rule,” said James Gelfand, president and CEO of the ERISA Industry Committee. WELCOME TO THURSDAY PULSE. I’m Kelly Hooper, POLITICO’s health insurance reporter. Hat tip to former Pulse co-author Ben Leonard, who pointed out that the Energy and Commerce Committee’s power button logo is actually a sideways E and C. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@politico.com, and follow along @kelhoops.
|